Explaining Net Neutrality
Apr. 16th, 2008 12:07 pmI think the lack of public concern about this problem is the lack of knowledge about it. A good way to explain is if you had Rogers cable, and they had a deal with NBC and CTV...all NBC & CTV programs would show up at their scheduled time, but CBC, CBS, ABC, etc would always start between 5 and 15 minutes later than their scheduled time.
So, unless your favourate station station paid off Rogers, you will not get the service you expect. And, if course, this raises the whole spectre of Payola in a totally different format.
To take this scenario into the internet realm. Rogers has a deal with Yahoo, so you might have to wait longer to get results back from Google's, or Microsoft's search engines, or find that when accessing your Hotmail and Gmail accounts they take forever to load, but your Yahoo mail pops up instantly.
And that is just the thin edge of the problem.
Imagine, if Rogers and Yahoo signed an even more restrictive deal that didn't slow down Gmail and Hotmail, but totally blocked them? There is no law that I am aware of that would prevent them from doing so. If they felt they could make money doing it it this way, they could.
If, on the other hand, we had some sort of binding net neutrality agreement, then the Payola of the Internet would be clipped at the bud.
So, unless your favourate station station paid off Rogers, you will not get the service you expect. And, if course, this raises the whole spectre of Payola in a totally different format.
To take this scenario into the internet realm. Rogers has a deal with Yahoo, so you might have to wait longer to get results back from Google's, or Microsoft's search engines, or find that when accessing your Hotmail and Gmail accounts they take forever to load, but your Yahoo mail pops up instantly.
And that is just the thin edge of the problem.
Imagine, if Rogers and Yahoo signed an even more restrictive deal that didn't slow down Gmail and Hotmail, but totally blocked them? There is no law that I am aware of that would prevent them from doing so. If they felt they could make money doing it it this way, they could.
If, on the other hand, we had some sort of binding net neutrality agreement, then the Payola of the Internet would be clipped at the bud.